Toolkit

FedRAMP readiness cheat sheet

A one-page summary to work from, not a substitute for the full guide or the official text.

Saves a one-page PDF straight to your device. It is put together by your browser, on this page — nothing is uploaded.

Who it's for. Cloud service providers (IaaS, PaaS or SaaS) that want US federal agencies to use their offerings.

Scope

  • Applies per cloud service offering, not the whole company — check the FedRAMP Marketplace listing for what's actually authorised
  • Rev5 (established model, NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 baselines) and FedRAMP 20x (automation-focused, go-forward model) currently run in parallel
  • New Rev5 submissions are estimated to close 11 June 2027; 20x currently covers Low/Moderate-equivalent classes, with High still in development

Key requirements

  • Decide your target impact level or 20x class, based on the data and mission your federal customers will actually use
  • Find an agency sponsor — most paths still need one
  • Under Rev5: build the system security plan, and have a 3PAO produce the security assessment plan and report
  • Under 20x: invest in automated, machine-readable evidence against the published key security indicators
  • Run continuous monitoring after authorisation — monthly scanning and POA&M updates under Rev5
  • List the offering on the FedRAMP Marketplace once authorised, and keep its status current

Evidence to gather

  • System security plan and supporting attachments (policies, inventory, interconnections, incident response and contingency plans)
  • Security assessment plan and report (Rev5) or key security indicator evidence (20x)
  • Plan of action and milestones
  • Monthly vulnerability scan results and continuous monitoring deliverables
  • Significant-change request records

Common gaps

  • Calling a service 'FedRAMP compliant' without an actual Marketplace authorisation — readiness or in-process status isn't authorisation
  • Underestimating the ongoing effort of continuous monitoring, which usually exceeds the initial package
  • Starting at too high or too low an impact level for the data actually involved
  • Confusing FedRAMP with GovRAMP (state/local government) or CMMC (defence contractors) — different programmes

This is general educational information, condensed by MajorCyber™ in its own words, not legal, audit or certification advice, and not a compliance assessment, certification or attestation of any kind. It is a starting checklist, not a complete statement of the framework's requirements — confirm anything material against the full FedRAMP guide, the official text, or a qualified adviser.

MajorCyber™ · Security Lights the Way majorcyber.org/toolkits/fedramp/